![]() I've also noticed that when I scored incredibly low (just trying to Tilt and end the table as quickly as possible so I could see my Pro Score), I'd often have a second high score at the very BOTTOM of the list. Must have had a good fluke run that day! Whereas I gotta get my rear back to Blade, as I'm not even in the Top 2,000 on that! I also didn't realize my high score in Shaman was actually in the Top 100. At first glance, it may be something similar to the formula I speculated on above, but I'll check to verify. I'll crunch the numbers when I have some time and see if there's some obvious correlation between how rapidly you lose points from your 1,000 Pro Score based off of rank and players. I've written down my Rank, Pro Score and Number of Players for each table (both for this project and so I'll know which tables I need to improve the most on). Either the system is broken or they're ironing out the bugs on the Fantastic Four table and leaving the rest of us unable to play it. Just an idea of a possible dynamic formula, probably nowhere close to the real thing.Īnother question - how does someone on the Pro Score leaderboard have a score over 26,000 at the moment? That's higher than the "maximum possible" right now. The first place player would be the only one to "round up" to 1,000. So if there's 10,000 people playing the table, and you're rank #883, you'd getġ,000 - ((883) / (10)) = 911.7 = 911 (Rounding down to keep multiple 1,000 Pro Scores from happening.) Pro Score = 1,000 - ((Current Leaderboard Rank) / (Overall Number of Players / 1,000)) It's probably something similar to the idea of What I'm trying to figure out though is the formula used to calculate the pro score.Not sure it would do much good even if you had it, without knowing exactly how many people have played the table you're wondering about at that time. (This may be offset by new people playing tables and getting LOWER than your high score - it's even possible for your Pro Score to INCREASE without doing anything from this.)Īs for specific "number crunching" involving Pro Score, you'd need someone that actually knows the code. If you stop playing for a few weeks then come back, you may find you've lost a considerable amount of Pro Score the next time you play because of all the people who have beaten your high score on various tables. There could be dozens or hundreds of players with a Pro Score of 500 on a popular table. * It's safe to say that the absolute highest score gets 1,000 and the absolute lowest score gets 1, but any other Pro Score value could be duplicated. I have a Pro Score of over 23,000 (meaning I'm averaging over 880 Pro Score per table) but there are very few tables where my score is in the Top 100 players. ![]() * A decent score will typically get you 900+ Pro Score (at least at this point, might be different in a month or two when more scores are entered compared to the first week). (Which makes sense, because in the first example you're in the Top 5% and in the other you're in the Top 50%.) Getting Rank #500 will give you more Pro Score points if ten thousand people have played the table compared to only one thousand. ![]() * Your Pro Score for a table is scaled based off of the number of people who have scores in it. I can't give you the specific formula, but: ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |